Comparación de diferentes métodos para la detección de resistencia a meticilina en Staphylococcus aureus / [Comparison of different detection methods for methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus]

The investigation of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a serious problem for the physician and microbiologist. Accurate and rapid detection is essential for the use of appropriate antimicrobial therapy and for the control of nosocomial spread of the resistant strain. The performance characteristics of the MicroScan Overnight Conventional Pos Combo 12 panels (MOCP), BBL Crystal MRSA ID (CR), E-test and agar screen plate (Muller Hinton agar with oxacillin 6 micrograms/ml and 4

NaCl) (AS) were evaluated for the detection of oxacillin resistance. Thirty S. aureus clinically significant strains with different PFGE (Pulse Field Gel Electrophoresis) banding pattern were tested, and 22 of them were mecA positive by PCR. These strains were also analyzed by mecA and Tn554 polymorphism. All mecA positive strains were classified as methicillin resistant by MOCP and E-test. CR and AS failed to detect oxacillin resistance in 2 strains. One false positive was only detected by E-test. Accurate testing for the presence of MRSA may reduce the need for empiric therapy with vancomycin for patients with staphylococcal infections. According to our results the best performance was obtained with MOCP. However, as a rapid method, CR gave acceptable sensitivity for clinical purposes.

Hemocultivos: utilidad de los antibiogramas presuntivos / Blood cultures: use of presumptive antiobiograms

Mortality associated to bacteremia varies between 20 and 40 depending upon several factors, such as focus of infection, microorganism, host conditions, etc. It has also been documented that mortality may double when the patient does not receive antibiotic treatment to which the microorganism is susceptible. The objective of our work has been to determine the correlation between disk diffusion antibiogram according to NCCLS guidelines, from isolated colonies, and the one performed directly from the blood culture flask. During 1996, in the Institute of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery (ICYCC) in Buenos Aires City, 81 episodes of bacteremia were studied. In every case, an antibiogram was carried out: 1) from the bottle: a- Directly (D), harvesting 20 microliters in Mueller Hinton agar, b- Diluted (d), previous centrifugation and Gram staining to adjust turbidity equivalent to 0.5 Mc Farland; 2) from isolated colonies, according to NCCLS guidelines. There were almost no major errors, except with two strains of Enterobacter cloacae versus cephalotin. The diluted method was not so convenient to read inhibition zones, especially with staphylococci. With gram-positive bacteria, the main problems appeared in the direct method with erythromycin, oxacillin and ciprofloxacin because of minor errors. With gram-negative bacteria, major errors were observed in the direct method, mainly with piperacillin (7) and to a lesser extent with piperacillin tazobactam (2). Except for imipenem, trimethoprim sulfamethoxazoie and cefotaxime, all antimicrobial agents presented minor errors with both methodologies. Based upon the high rate of minor errors, we consider it is important to confirm results obtained with the standard technique (NCCLS), considering as presumptive those results from the blood culture bottles (D and d).